Global Warming Program Reports
Search
•
RSS Feed
|
Driving Global Warming: Commuting in Connecticut and its Contribution to Global Warming
2006-02-07
drivinggw.pdf
|
Executive Summary
As the new home of ConnPIRG's environmental work, Environment Connecticut can be contacted regarding this report. Transportation is the leading source of global
warming pollution in Connecticut, and trips
to and from work are a major part of the
problem. Just over a quarter of all vehicle miles nationally
are driven on trips to and from work. To reduce
global warming pollution from cars and trucks
– and to meet the goals of the state’s climate change
action plan – Connecticut must find ways to reduce
the global warming impact of commuting.
A review of data collected by the U.S. Census Bureau
identifies which towns in the state are responsible for
the greatest amount of commuting-related emissions
of carbon dioxide (the leading cause of global warming)
and suggests ways that the state can effectively
reduce emissions.
Commuters in Connecticut’s fast-growing “exurbs”
produce about three times more carbon dioxide, on
average, than commuters living in Connecticut’s
more densely developed cities.
• Commuters living in Connecticut’s oldest and most
densely developed cities – such as Hartford, New
Haven, and New London – produce the lowest
emissions of carbon dioxide per worker in the state.
By contrast, fast-growing “exurban” communities
produce much greater per capita levels of emissions.
(See Fig. ES-1.)
Drive-alone trips produce the majority of commuting-
related global warming pollution in Connecticut.
• About four out of every five Connecticut commuters
drive to work alone. Towns with the greatest
proportion of drive-alone commuters also tend to
have the highest per-worker global warming emissions
from commuting.
• While Connecticut has an extensive rail network,
it fails to serve adequately the state’s centers of
employment. Although four of the five largest cities
in Connecticut are located along the state’s rail
network, the majority of commuters traveling to
these cities drive alone to work – less than 4 percent
of these commuters ride the train. (See Fig.
ES-2.)
Good transit service can reduce carbon dioxide emissions
from commuting. For example, only 17 percent
of commutes to Manhattan (the leading
out-of-state draw for Connecticut commuters) occur
via single-passenger automobile, leading to significantly
lower emissions from these commutes.
• Commuters traveling into New York City make
up the majority (78 percent) of all Connecticut
commuters who ride commuter rail to work. The effectiveness of the regional rail network in transporting
commuters to New York City should serve
as a platform for increasing transit to communities
located along the regional rail network and
reducing Connecticut’s total carbon dioxide emissions.
Connecticut should take a series of immediate and
long-term actions to reduce global warming pollution
from commuting. The state should fully implement
the state’s Climate Change Action Plan, which
includes numerous policies for reducing global
warming pollution from all forms of vehicle travel.
Specific areas of focus should include:
• Extending the regional transit network to promote
connections with residential and work locations
in neighboring states and in areas currently
underserved by transit.
• Encouraging transit-oriented development, improving
transit service to centers of employment
located along the existing regional rail network,
and making the state’s rail stations more accessible.
• Putting the brakes on exurban development in rural
areas by revitalizing Connecticut’s urban areas and
encouraging compact, mixed-use development.
• Adopting vehicle global warming emission standards
and incentives for the purchase of vehicles
that produce less carbon dioxide per mile.
|